On Tuesday afternoon, Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel issued a memo directing federal agencies to hold off on all pending regulations until the new administration has had the opportunity to study them. For regulations that have already been published in the Federal Register but have not yet taken effect--including the interim final rule on competitive bidding, published Jan. 16--the administration will consider extending the effective date for 60 days.

The rule was to take effect Feb. 15, but under the memo, that date could be extended to April 16.

The memo does not automatically suspend or retract the interim final rule, which includes instructions for a rebid of Round One in 2009 (see HomeCare Monday Special Alert, Jan. 15). Neither does it extend the comment period for the rule, which ends March 17. It also does not rescind rules already in effect, such as the post-cap payment rules for oxygen issued in November.

Still, a possible extension in the effective date of the new competitive bidding rule was encouraging news, industry manufacturers and providers said.

“With regard to the recent CMS interim final rule on competitive bidding, this provides us an opportunity to work with the new administration to review this rushed regulation that had no public or industry input,” said Cara Bachenheimer, senior vice president of government relations for Elyria, Ohio-based Invacare Corp.

CMS’ first attempt at competitive bidding was halted July 15, two weeks after implementation, by the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act. The law mandated a number of changes to the bidding project and delayed its implementation after providers in Round One detailed numerous problems with CMS’ bid submission process and review of financial documentation. Of 6,500 bids, CMS offered contracts to only 329 providers in the first 10 bidding areas. Resulting reimbursements were cut by an average 26 percent.

But Bachenheimer said CMS addressed few of the issues surrounding the troubled bidding program in its new rule. “Our goal with regard to the agency moving forward under MIPAA’s directive is to work more collaboratively with the new administration to: 1) educate them about the fundamental flaws of the bidding program; and 2) have them suspend the rule while the agency, in conjunction with affected parties, can reshape the rule to address those fundamental flaws,” she said.

Seth Johnson, vice president of government relations for Pride Mobility Products, Exeter, Pa., said extension of the rule’s effective date “provides a new opportunity to get the new administration to retract the whole interim final rule.”

Toward that end, numerous industry organizations are urging providers to contact their legislators to press for their support in halting the new bidding rule. This time, they said, they feel like they have a lot more leverage thanks to supporters in Congress and the ravages of a devastated economy.

“It’s not as though we haven’t learned [from the last time],” said Georgie Blackburn, vice president of government relations for Blackburn’s Pharmacy in Tarantum, Pa., noting that there now are people with muscle in Washington “who want to hear what we have to say. People who worked with us so well and so efficiently last year are still there.”

And many of them are concerned about the reappearance of the bidding program, according to Johnson, noting committee leaders on both sides of the aisle were “alarmed” when CMS released the rule in the last hours of the Bush administration. “I think we have a leg up from where we were a year ago,” he said. “I do think the new administration will want to make sure they are paying appropriately for items and services, but I do not think they are wedded to moving forward with this competitive bidding program.”

Johnson noted another message that might be particularly important to this administration: Competitive bidding does not create jobs.

“When you look at the message that he ran on in his campaign and the state of the economy today, President Obama continues to state that it is his administration’s priority to create jobs,” Johnson pointed out. “And he … believes there needs to be an increase in home health care. Clearly, when you look at competitive bidding, it is counter to the administration’s priority.”

“I can’t imagine that anyone in D.C. can embrace a program that would put 90 percent of providers [in the affected areas] out of business,” added Blackburn.

“Last time, 501 oxygen providers in [the Miami bidding area] were reduced to 44,” said Rob Brant, president of the Accredited Medical Equipment Providers of America. “Four hundred power wheelchair providers were reduced to 25. Do we really want to do that?”

The few changes to the interim final rule and its implications for beneficiary access and small business point up the importance of fighting it, Brant said. “People thought because it was delayed, that was the end of it. But it’s not. It is not magically going to go away. We have to end it.”